Re: babl portability patches, and a test failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Hi Sven,

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:46:29AM +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 08:56:59PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:27 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > attached is a patch for babl_log. I am not too happy with the outcome as
> > > it will result in less informative log output on platforms that don't
> > > support variadic macros. But I guess that's somewhat hard to avoid and
> > > hopefully the most important platforms will support this feature. I'd
> > > appreciate feedback on this patch.
> > 
> > Gary, I exptected some feedback, but didn't hear from you. Are you not
> > any longer interested to get the babl portability problems solved?
> I've split apart my patches, and ported them to today's git master
> branch, and am in the process of uploading them to

Has anyone been able to find time to look at my patch queue for babl?

I've also uploaded a similar patch queue for gegl itself, though I'm
still unable to get it working on 2 of the 30 architectures we

If there's anything else I should do to help shepherd these patches
into the trunk, please let me know.

Gary V. Vaughan (gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Gegl-developer mailing list

[Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [gtk]     [GIMP Users]     [KDE]     [Scanner]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]     [Webcams]