- To: "Paulo J. Matos" <paulo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Optimizer bug, gcc 4.1.2
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:35:19 -0700
- Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- In-reply-to: <jtk210$ftd$1@dough.gmane.org>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Paulo J. Matos <paulo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/07/12 15:34, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged
>>> material intended for the addressee only.
>>
>>
>> We can not help anyone who sends messages with such a disclaimer. If
>> all of your mails must send this because of a corporate rule, please
>> use a webmail system.
>>
>
> OT:
> People actually read disclaimers?
Yes, and the documented policy of the gcc.gnu.org mailing lists is to
reject e-mail with legal disclaimers that prohibit the messages from
being archived on the web. It's unfortunate that this one got through
the filters.
Ian
[Linux C Programming]
[Linux Kernel]
[eCos]
[Fedora Development]
[Fedora Announce]
[Autoconf]
[The DWARVES Debugging Tools]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux GCC]