Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Looking at the debug info and the generated assembly, the values of
>>> variables 'f1' and 'd1' are stored in the same register.
>>> Due to this, while debugging, after setting the break point at (A)
>>> [line no 8], if we print the value of 'f1' i get the wrong value.
>>
>>
>>> Q: Is this the side effect of using 'register' keyword? If 'f1' is
>>> getting optimized out, shouldn't we get that info while debugging?
>>
>> This question as stated is not really appropriate for the mailing list
>> gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx, which is for the development of GCC itself. This
>> question would be appropriate for gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx. Please take any
>> followups to gcc-help. Thanks.
>>
>> This has nothing to do with using the register keyword.
>>
>> Yes, you should ideally be told when a value is unavailable. This
>> specific area of GCC has been much improved since GCC 4.5.2.
>>
>
> Thanks Ian.
> I tried with gcc v4.6.3 and get the same behavior.
> Should this be considered as a bug with debug info generation then?
Yes.
Ian
[Linux C Programming]
[Linux Kernel]
[eCos]
[Fedora Development]
[Fedora Announce]
[Autoconf]
[The DWARVES Debugging Tools]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux GCC]