- To: tprince@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Why are mpfr, mpc and gmp needed for gcc?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 21:40:26 +0100
- Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- In-reply-to: <CAH6eHdSQAK4Q=5KG9PHDH-NKwZSvsQX=0Miy0DuQqRRk+oUSOg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2 April 2012 21:39, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 2 April 2012 21:21, Tim Prince wrote:
>> On 04/02/2012 12:35 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>
>>> As it says there, the simplest way to install them is from your OS
>>> package management system. The next best option is to use the
>>> contrib/download_prerequisites script in the GCC source. Either of
>>> those options should ensure everything just works. The last resort,
>>> which usually causes problems for people who don't know what they're
>>> doing, is to install the support library from source.
>>
>> download_prerequisites does install from source (integrated into the gcc
>> build). It saves a lot of annoyance over hunting for the right versions.
>> I've used those downloads separately to configure and make installations in
>> /usr as well.
>
> Building them in-tree so gcc directly to static libs doesn't *install*
Oops, that should say "so gcc links directly"
> the libs, and so avoids the oh-so-common problem of needing to tell
> the runtime linker where shared libraries are, which is what causes
> problems for people who install the libraries separately in
> non-standard locations.
>
> Please feel free to improve the InstallingGCC wiki page if you can
> make it clearer, but please note I'm more concerned about that page
> giving users clear instructions that will result in a successful
> installation than whether it's strictly accurate or not regarding
> technicalities.
[Linux C Programming]
[Linux Kernel]
[eCos]
[Fedora Development]
[Fedora Announce]
[Autoconf]
[The DWARVES Debugging Tools]
[Yosemite Campsites]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux GCC]