Re: bootstrap build bigger than non-bootstrap?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 03/12/2012 10:09 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc <at> gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>> On 11 March 2012 16:37, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>>>> How come a bootstrap build of gcc is almost triple the size as a
>>>> non-boostrap build?
>>>
>>>
>>> By what measure, disk space used by the build dir?
>>
>> No, because that would make sense  I mean the resulting binaries.
> 
> In my case a non-bootstrap build is 81M, and a bootstrap build is 324M.

objdump is your friend.  Have a look at section sizes.

Andrew.


[Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

Add to Google