[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Ongoing Error with runtime libraries building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to use AddressSanitizer of gcc-4.8 on Arm target
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help Ragarding the table of contents
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help Ragarding the table of contents
- From: Abbas Chunawala <abbas.chunawala@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- How to use AddressSanitizer of gcc-4.8 on Arm target
- From: "Jungsoo Son" <jungsoo.son@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Method call and calling convention
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Problem calling C .dll library from Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Problem calling C .dll library from Fortran using ISO_C_BINDING
- From: Pietro Ghillani <ghillo.p@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Method call and calling convention
- From: Kifa The Great <kifathegreat@xxxxxxxxx>
- LTO : how to specify number of chunks with option -flto-partition=balanced
- From: Swati Rathi <swatirathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SVN checkout failure
- From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
- From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrap error
- From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Need to know the reason why GCC able to compile
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Need to know the reason why GCC able to compile
- From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: SVN checkout failure
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- SVN checkout failure
- From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Request
- From: fomengia glen <gfomengia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Potentially bogus warning about anonymous types
- From: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrap error
- From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
- gcc trunk bootstrap fails on darwin with linker assertion
- From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: #num line directives suppress warnings in C code?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- #num line directives suppress warnings in C code?
- From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrap error
- From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
- Re: passing glob an argument
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: extra information in rtx data structure.
- From: "Viktor Pobedin" <viktor.pobedin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: passing glob an argument
- From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
- MinGW targets & Large Precompiled Headers and 'cc1plus.exe' crash
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- VCG tool
- From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: passing glob an argument
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- passing glob an argument
- From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
- proposed docs for i386 modifiers for extended asm
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Simulated optimization -Og possible on <4.8 gcc?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extra information in rtx data structure.
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with multilib paths in a Canadian build
- From: "jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
- From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
- From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Has dlopen() behaviour changed between gcc4.1 and gcc 4.4?
- From: David Aldrich <David.Aldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
- From: Charles Smith <cts.private@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- extra information in rtx data structure.
- From: "Viktor Pobedin" <viktor.pobedin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Simulated optimization -Og possible on <4.8 gcc?
- From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ignored optimization command
- From: Gene Smith <gds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem with multilib paths in a Canadian build
- From: "jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible release date of GCC 4.8.1
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Possible release date of GCC 4.8.1
- From: Beren Oguz <berenoguz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS help
- From: Charles Smith <cts.private@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Stage 2 cc1 hang on AIX 7.1
- From: Andy314 <andy314@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
- From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Stage 2 cc1 hang on AIX 7.1
- From: Andy314 <andy314@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: "David P. Riedel" <driedel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
- From: YuGiOhJCJ Mailing-List <yugiohjcj-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Is it really possible to install gcc using prerequisites are installed in non standard directories.
- From: Allan Kamau <kamauallan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- check-DEJAGNU error occurred when running gcc4.6.3 testsuite
- From: Sylvia <xdwang_tju@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Strange errors linking libstdc++.so
- From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
- From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
- From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- problem when I run MAKE for gcc-4.8.0
- From: Xiangqian Guo <xqguo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7.2 overhead of auto lambda expression
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.7.2 overhead of auto lambda expression
- From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Where are the NON extended asm docs?
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Where are the NON extended asm docs?
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linking with libs built on older gcc version
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- linking with libs built on older gcc version
- From: saurabhjain <saurabh.jain2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrap error
- From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrap error
- From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrap error
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: David Kirkby <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Bootstrap error
- From: "Douglas B. Staple" <dstaple@xxxxxx>
- Re: C std question: while loop with two tests.
- From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C std question: while loop with two tests.
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- C std question: while loop with two tests.
- From: "Steve Ellcey " <sellcey@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C Integers
- From: Jose-Marcio Martins <Jose-Marcio.Martins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- C Integers
- From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: locking.h
- From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: locking.h
- From: Dan Hitt <dan.hitt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: locking.h
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- locking.h
- From: JimJoyce <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: configure failed for installing gcc
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- configure failed for installing gcc
- From: Brian Lee <brian.h.lee.90@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to install libdecnumber?
- From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: how to install libdecnumber?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- how to install libdecnumber?
- From: "David P. Riedel" <driedel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
- From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
- From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: New target powerpc64 symbol collision
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- New target powerpc64 symbol collision
- From: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- gcc/cpp preprocessoor continue on error
- From: Paul Hansen <paul.hansen.name@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
- From: Mihai Vasilian <grayasm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: iterators of a swapped std::list
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- iterators of a swapped std::list
- From: Mihai Vasilian <grayasm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.8 libgfortran build fail
- From: David Johnson <da.johnson.a@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ compiler not found
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ compiler not found
- From: Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C++ Compiler
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pthread option documentation
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- C++ Compiler
- From: Scarlbc <scarlbc@xxxxxxxxx>
- pthread option documentation
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- pitiful results for GCC 4.8.0
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Compiling static and shared libraries
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling static and shared libraries
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Compiling static and shared libraries
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiling static and shared libraries
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Compiling static and shared libraries
- From: "Andy Falanga (afalanga)" <afalanga@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [gcc-help] Cannot find "vms/chfdef.h" while cross-compiling gcc-4.8.0 for alpha
- From: mehmet basaran <mehmetbasaran89@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
- From: Daniel Janzon <daniel.janzon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Use -Werror but don't fail on #warning directives
- From: Daniel Janzon <daniel.janzon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Ongoing Error in make stage2 building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Generating gimple statements from pragma's
- From: Julien Peeters <jj.peeters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
- [gcc accept invalid ?] copy volatile struct
- From: Дмитрий Дьяченко <dimhen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC not found
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- C++ compiler not found
- From: "Brummer, J, Mnr <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>" <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC not found
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- GCC not found
- From: "Brummer, J, Mnr <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>" <jbrummer@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does "configure" and "cmake" determines the gcc's version?
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- How does "configure" and "cmake" determines the gcc's version?
- From: Glen <cnglen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Plugin, pragmas and braces
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Binary literals in C++1y
- From: Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Low level file access
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Low level file access
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Low level file access
- From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
- Kudos!
- From: Nick <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reduction of logic to arithmetic
- From: Ranganath kulkarni <kulkarni137@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm docs - re-written
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- extended asm docs - re-written
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Missed optimization when using a structure
- From: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compatibility with MSVC __thiscall?
- From: whathaveyoudone@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: minix3
- From: David Brown <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- minix3
- From: Roger Jowett <rogerjowett@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Plugin, pragmas and braces
- From: Marco Lattuada <ml.lattuada@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: float to int conversion
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: ketmar <ketmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: float to int conversion
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: float to int conversion
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: float to int conversion
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: David Paterson <dnpaterson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: ketmar <ketmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: float to int conversion
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: float to int conversion
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- float to int conversion
- From: "Warlich, Christof" <christof.warlich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Support of non-temporal stores on ia32/Core2?
- From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@xxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Low level file access
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ENThomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Low level file access
- From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
- Low level file access
- From: ballsystemlord <doark@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Multiarch vs Multilib documentations
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Finding the address of a function
- From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Finding the address of a function
- From: MARGUINAUD Philippe <philippe.marguinaud@xxxxxxxx>
- Multiarch vs Multilib documentations
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- --exclude-libs and uninitialized variables
- From: Srinivas Kommu <kommu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
- From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Profiling a dlopened library
- From: Niklaus <niklaus@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Compatibility with MSVC __thiscall?
- From: whathaveyoudone@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- What is the c++11 steady_clock measuring?
- From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: div>mode>3 library calls
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help required
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help required
- From: sonal <sonalr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm - what does this option do?
- From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- extended asm - what does this option do?
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Inconsistant exception API: `libgcc_s` and `cc1` don't agree
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- What's the purpose of the `--enable-ld` option of `configure`?
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: div>mode>3 library calls
- From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bulk] Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bulk] Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- div>mode>3 library calls
- From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- “--disable-multiarch” produce error about missing “bits.h”
- From: Hibou57 <yannick_duchene@xxxxxxxx>
- div>mode>3 library calls
- From: Hendrik Greving <hendrik.greving.intel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining PCH use
- From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining PCH use
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Determining PCH use
- From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Determining the amount of RAM required to build a particular OSS/FS application
- From: Michael Lueck <mlueck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
- From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
- From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Possible gcc bug with setjmp()?
- From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Building Cross GCC 4.6.3 with sysroot.
- From: Johan Karlsson <Johan.Karlsson@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 4.8 cross compiler help needed
- From: NeonJohn <jgd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Power/Energy Awareness in GCC
- From: Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC reuses stack slot in setjmp-calling function -- is it a bug or feature?
- From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
- GCC reuses stack slot in setjmp-calling function -- is it a bug or feature?
- From: Konstantin Vladimirov <konstantin.vladimirov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Cannot stat gcc/include-fixed/limits.h when installing GCC 4.7.2
- From: "Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott" <pjm@xxxxxxx>
- Catch selecting on exception
- From: Jan Šebetovský <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
- From: "Bob Wyatt" <bwyatt_sub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 'make' issue with GCC-4.7.2-1/gcc-c++-4.7.2-1 on AIX 6.1
- From: "Bob Wyatt" <bwyatt_sub@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [#ILA-980211]: hey
- From: "General" <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C11 support status in GCC?
- From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Are there an option to pass assembler option to lto wrapper?
- From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>
- Are there an option to pass assembler option to lto wrapper?
- From: Konstantin Vladimirov <konstantin.vladimirov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C11 support status in GCC?
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to require an extra register in define_split?
- From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C11 support status in GCC?
- From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C11 support status in GCC?
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: C11 support status in GCC?
- From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to require an extra register in define_split?
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- set operations on gcov output
- From: Adam Crain <jadamcrain@xxxxxxxxx>
- How to require an extra register in define_split?
- From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
- From: jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why is the strong symbol in a shared library overridden by a weak symbol in a static library?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Why is the strong symbol in a shared library overridden by a weak symbol in a static library?
- From: "Jie Jiang" <jiangjie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Building recent gcc (4.8.0) fails
- From: jayjwa <jayjwa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Trampolines on Harvard architecture?
- From: James Bowman <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
- From: Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@xxxxxxxxx>
- constexpr for C?
- From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
- From: scalpel4k <scalpel4k@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: access specifiers & class inheritance
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- access specifiers & class inheritance
- From: scalpel4k <scalpel4k@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- C11 support status in GCC?
- From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-gate.so.1 not exist ?
- From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-gate.so.1 not exist ?
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: R_X86_64_COPY bug
- From: Fredrick Prashanth John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.8.0 prerequisites
- From: Alan Sayre <ansayre62@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
- From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dllexport and inline methods
- From: JonY <10walls@xxxxxxxxx>
- dllexport and inline methods
- From: Geoff Worboys <geoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization based on CPU type or flags?
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Hacked ipad ,hacked icloud, boviaword@xxxxxxxxxx
- From: Patricio Calderon <boviaworld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
- From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
- From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Question on GCC 4.8 atomics
- From: Bjorn Lindgren <nr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8 const vector<const string>
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.8 const vector<const string>
- From: "Wood, Tobias" <tobias.wood@xxxxxxxxx>
- "SSE register return with SSE disabled" for unused functionality
- From: "Симеон Златарев" <simeon.zlatarev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: optimization based on CPU type or flags?
- From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@xxxxxxxxxx>
- optimization based on CPU type or flags?
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Regexp in scan-assembler-not
- From: "Paulo Matos" <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dlclose() with zero references does not call library destructor
- From: Paweł Sikora <pluto@xxxxxxxx>
- Regexp in scan-assembler-not
- From: "Paulo Matos" <pmatos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- dlclose() with zero references does not call library destructor
- From: charles quarra <charllsnotieneningunputocorreo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Default Architecture
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Default Architecture
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build GCC4.8 fail when make
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Build GCC4.8 fail when make
- From: Jerry OELoo <oyljerry@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC-4.8.0 MinGW MIPS cross compiler build fails
- From: Amir Gonnen <amirgonnen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DWARF-4 : missing DW_TAG_typedef for anonymous structures in C++
- From: Jan Smets <jan.smets@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building against another glibc
- From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Building against another glibc
- From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Building against another glibc
- From: Booty Bootstrapper <e519154@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
- From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
- From: "Dudley, David" <ddudley@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Which is the best language for high performance output..
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Which is the best language for high performance output..
- From: Norah Jones <nh.jones01@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- DWARF-4 : missing DW_TAG_typedef for anonymous structures in C++
- From: Jan Smets <jan.smets@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm and register clobbers
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: extended asm and register clobbers
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- extended asm and register clobbers
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: glibc will not compile with -flto
- From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
- From: Alexpux <alexpux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
- From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: glibc will not compile with -flto
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Broken SO due to dropped dependencies
- From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Default include directories
- From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
- glibc will not compile with -flto
- From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
- GCC-4.8.0 lto plugin depends from old libgcc
- From: Алексей Павлов <alexpux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
- From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
- From: David Abdurachmanov <david.abd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Symbols names in AddressSanitizer backtrace
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Effects of Link Time Optimizations in Illegal Libraries
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
- From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@xxxxxx>
- LTO_tags out of range: Range is 0 to 365, value is 1432
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Default include directories
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Default include directories
- From: Miguel Guedes <miguel.a.guedes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
- From: ikrabbe.ask@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
- From: nagarjun <nagarjunreddy.iit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- what is the equivalent of -xM1(solaris compiler option) in gcc
- From: nagarjun <nagarjunreddy.iit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: :: not recognized in 4.1.1
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- :: not recognized in 4.1.1
- From: chinhow <how_lim82@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: libstdc++ concept checking
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- atoimic type variants
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- libstdc++ concept checking
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Correct use of "-flto"
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Correct use of "-flto"
- From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
- acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
- lto-wrapper failure in GCC 4.8.0
- From: Matt Godbolt <matt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
- From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@xxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
- From: Martin Corino <mcorino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Correct use of "-flto"
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Another question re asm constraints
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Compiler speed (vanilla vs. LTO, PGO and LTO+PGO)
- From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: acceptable versions of cloog?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Correct use of "-flto"
- From: John Frankish <j-frankish@xxxxxxx>
- Re: about inline
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about inline
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.8 build
- From: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@xxxxxxxxx>
- 4.8.0 on SPARC/Solaris 10 test issues
- From: Steven Christensen <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Exception handling problems with MinGW64 GCC 4.8.0 with SEH
- From: Martin Corino <mcorino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Another question re asm constraints
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto
- From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about inline
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- paradox re: constraints for ReadWrite memory in asm instruction
- From: dw <limegreensocks@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.8.0 compile with lto
- From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Symbol visibility and namespace
- From: Dániel Varga <vargad88@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about inline
- From: Oleg Endo <oleg.endo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about inline
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc 4.8.0 bootstrap fails on darwin with linker assertion
- From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@xxxxxxxxx>
- about inline
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 4.8.0 : Neither go nor ada built due to excessive errors with both.
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: std::wstring_convert
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
- From: "C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP" <cjac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- std::wstring_convert
- From: Mihai Moldovan <ionic@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <extralevelinsoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- gcc (linker) 2.95.4 / pthreads / samba-3.5.21 / i386-unknown-freebsd4.11
- From: "C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP" <cjac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian)
- From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian)
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.7.2 build x86_64 (debian)
- From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support
- From: Bharath Ramesh <bramesh@xxxxxx>
- Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- GCC and Intel Xeon Phi (Intel MIC) support
- From: Bharath Ramesh <bramesh@xxxxxx>
- Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Error in make building gcc-4.7.2
- From: "Ellis N. Thomas" <ExtraLeveLInSoftware@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- char* to string: Differences between v4.4.5 and v4.6.1
- From: Alexander Striffeler <a.striffeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RFE: long overdue method to indicate bootstrap success
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- gprof: derivation of the uncertainty/error result
- From: David Flater <dflater@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: building gcc on slackware64 14
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- 4.8.0 RC odd messages in stage 1 : objdump: command not found
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gcc 4.7.2 guality faults in slackware14 but not 13 AMD64
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8.0 released ?
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- building gcc on slackware64 14
- From: "B.S.J.W. Stephenson" <es018r6256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: GCC 4.8.0 released ?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- GCC 4.8.0 released ?
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Regarding the alignment limit of the alignas specifier
- From: "Emil 'Skeen' Madsen" <skeen@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
- From: Andrew Chi <achi@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Builtin int128 on gcc-4.7
- From: AlexVi <avinokur@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- -flto with -fwhole-program or -fuse-linker-plugin
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: -flto with -g
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- -flto with -g
- From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- parsing precedence of long integer literal "L"
- From: Andrew Chi <achi@xxxxxxx>
- Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
- From: zero modulo <zeromodulo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: internel of new operator
- From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- internel of new operator
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help building shared library: EXPORT preprocessor definition
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: programme header
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
- From: zero modulo <zeromodulo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrapping new architectures with C++
- From: Sam Thursfield <sam.thursfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Help building shared library: EXPORT preprocessor definition
- From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bootstrapping new architectures with C++
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help building shared library: EXPORT preprocessor definition
- From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Bootstrapping new architectures with C++
- From: Sam Thursfield <sam.thursfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- g++ compilation error on gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Extending gcc-4.5
- From: Hayder <hayder.alkhalissi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- `make` error: gmp.h: No such file or directory.
- From: zero modulo <zeromodulo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Getting GCC to target Windows RT
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Minimum debug options?
- From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: what does this mean?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Getting GCC to target Windows RT
- From: "Nathan K. Ladwig (Netham45)" <netham45@xxxxxxxxx>
- Controlling ld and as with GCC-Backend
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- programme header
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- what does this mean?
- From: ishare <june.tune.sea@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Minimum debug options?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Minimum debug options?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatic accessor function inlining
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- Minimum debug options?
- From: Raymond Jennings <shentino@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Automatic accessor function inlining
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
- Porting gcc to a nonstandard platform requires to call external program after linking
- From: Cosimo Caproni <cosimocaproni@xxxxxx>
- Automatic accessor function inlining
- From: LRN <lrn1986@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus@xxxxxxxx>
- gfortran question about optional subroutine arguments
- From: Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Application receives SIGILL
- From: OBD <1billiondolts@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Application receives SIGILL
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why does not RVO work in this case?
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: httpd startup error
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- httpd startup error
- From: andyroo <asmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Application receives SIGILL
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Application receives SIGILL
- From: OBD <1billiondolts@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why does not RVO work in this case?
- From: Henrik Mannerström <henrik.mannerstrom@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Function with two or more entry point
- Re: Function with two or more entry point
- Re: Function with two or more entry point
- From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Function with two or more entry point
- From: James Bowman <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Function with two or more entry point
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Function with two or more entry point
- Re: Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Question about implementation of new/delete and new[]/delete[] in gnu gcc
- From: Tim Schumacher <schumact@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: need help on 4.4.6
- From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: need help on 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
- From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
- From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Bad Register Number for libgcc
- From: Jens Mehler <jens.mehler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
- From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: help building 4.7.1
- From: "Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano, TX)" <mark.koenig3@xxxxxx>
- Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: help building 4.7.1
- From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 'char **' <-> 'unsigned char **' and aliasing/punning in C / GNU C
- From: Pedro Alves <palves@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: help building 4.7.1
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- help building 4.7.1
- From: "Koenig, Mark (ISS SCI - Plano, TX)" <mark.koenig3@xxxxxx>
- Re: need help on 4.4.6
- From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
- From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: g++ member function .at() for arrays
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LTO error in gcc-trunk
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: need help on 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: need help on 4.4.6
- From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxx>
- need help on 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Aw: Re: Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Aw: Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: gcc_mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxxx
- compile gcc 4.7.2 Ubuntu 12.04 fails with GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: "Daniel Albers" <Daniel.Albers@xxxxxxx>
- RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cross compiling stage 1 libgcc fails
- From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
- From: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
- From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Using libstdc++.so with a newer version of glibc without recompiling
- From: <Heiko.Papenfuss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Separate CFLAGS for libgcc?
- From: Chung-Ju Wu <jasonwucj@xxxxxxxxx>
- LTO error in gcc-trunk
- From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 4.7.2 install fails on Raspberry Pi
- From: Bela Markus <bmarkus@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: issues with gcc 4.4.6
- From: "GUPTA, GAURAV G (GAURAV)" <gaurav.g.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: "float complex" arithmetic performance much slower than expected
- From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
- Re: c++11 / unique_ptr with packaged_task
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
[Site Home]
[C Programming]
[Fedora Development]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Posix Books]
[Bugtraq]