Re: memory caching

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 2011-03-15 21:54, N. Harake wrote:
> 
> Things improved but maybe too much :), I was expecting a 100K IOPS not more
> 
> server1:~ # fio --name=job --directory=/lvm --size=1G --filesize=1G --iodepth=128 --iodepth_batch_complete=8 --iodepth_batch_submit=8 --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --numjobs=64 --bs= 4096 --rw=randwrite --group_reporting
> Jobs: 50 (f=50): [wwwwww_wwwwwww_wwwwwwwwww_wwwwwwwwwww_www_www_ww_www___ww_w__w_w] [98.3% done] [0K/570.8M /s] [0 /143K iops] [eta 00m:02s]
> 
>   write: io=65536MB, bw=584771KB/s, iops=146192 , runt=114761msec

If you use numjobs=64, you probably don't want 128 for io depth. Not
very realistic, and you'll likely end up running slower than you could.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Home]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Video Projectors]     [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Powered by Linux