Re: IOPS higher than expected on randwrite, direct=1 tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 2010-11-10 20:50, John Cagle wrote:
> If the disk is 2TB, then your 100GB test is only using 5% of it-- thus
> your observed IOPS will be a lot better than expected due to
> short-stroking.  Right?

That is also true, but probably not that much. See my previous email,
rotational latency should dominate here.

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Home]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Video Projectors]     [Free Online Dating]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

Powered by Linux