Re: Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?

["Dariusz J. Garbowski" <thuforuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/14/2006 07:15 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 22:23 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Arjan van de Ven (arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > I really like this idea; it's a simple "cat" and it can be done at a
> > > time where latency doesn't matter... (even in cron.daily)
> > >
> > > Oh... this opens more options. This also allows the "sort by
> > > blocknumber" to be done at this point and taken out of the critical
> > > latency part......
> > >
> > > great idea!
> > Of course, that then makes shutdown take twice as long.
>
> if you do it at shutdown, which is again a latency path :)
> cron.daily/weekly is less so ;)

+1 for cron
-1 for shutdown -> what about boxens, which are shutdown only on kernel 
updates? (like mine)

Regards,
Dariusz


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list