Re: Was, Re: FC17 and setroubleshoot, is policy bugs

[Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/03/2012 10:16 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Miroslav Grepl wrote:
> > On 07/03/2012 08:53 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Well, I went looking for setroubleshoot because we were getting a lot of
> > > crap in the logs after I upgraded one system to FC17. I installed it,
> > > and Dominick says is ought to be autorun on an event.
> > >
> > > Wellllll, I'm not seeing the usual "avc, blah, blah, run sealert ....".
> > >
> > > I thought I'd try another way, and found one immediate problem, that
> > > use_nfs_home_dirs was off. I tried to set it on, as root....
> > >
> > > setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs on
> > > libsepol.scope_copy_callback: entropyd: Duplicate declaration in module:
> > > type/attribute entropyd_var_run_t (No such file or directory).
> > > libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed (No such file or
> > > directory).
> > > Could not change policy booleans
> > >
> > > Bug?
> > Could you try to run
> >
> > semodule -n -s targeted -r xfs kudzu kerneloops execmem openoffice ada
> > tzdata hal hotplug howl java mono moilscanner gamin audio_entropy
> > audioentropy iscsid polkit_auth polkit rtkit_daemon ModemManager
> > telepathysofiasip ethereal passanger qpidd pyzor razor
> >
> > Which is supposed to be done in the package.
> That worked. After running that, I could do my setsebool.
>
> I will note that both the semodule and the setsebool took a truly
> ridiculous amount of time. It was at *least* one full minute or more for
> the setsebool.
>
>       mark
Yes, we know about that. You can execute

# semodule -d unconfined

which will disable unconfined domains but unconfined user will still 
exist. Then try to run semodule. It should be faster.

--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux