Re: 3.9 -> 3.10 policy language syntax changes

[Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> i suspect that you are confusing raw policy with human readable policy
>
> gen_tunable(allow_httpd_anon_write, false) versus bool httpd_anon_write false;
>
> etc
>   
Nope. I'll dig up some examples when I get home tonight. As for the 
language syntax changes, this is what I meant:

On 22/06/2011 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > Now I have the rather unpleasant task of upgrading my own customised
> > policy from the FC13 to FC15 version. Are there any changes from FC13 to
> > FC15 in terms of the language syntax or anything else I need to be aware
> > of before I start?
> >     
>
> Not that I recall.  F16 will add new stuff.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk4CMZ0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMHwCggv7bZaDAYCwxoja+ek2e9+VC
> HaIAoMM9V97gSfccgD9z1QPaqHZ6cZqB
> =EYr7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>   
So, in FC16 there was "new stuff" added in terms of changes to the 
language syntax. As I am upgrading the policy from FC15 to the present 
level (FC17) I just wanted to know what this "new stuff" is, that's all. 
I've already figured out the if ... else statement additions, which I 
don't remember seeing in 3.9 version of the policy, so provided I didn't 
get this wrong I'd like to know what else has been added?

--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux