Re: Policy version mismatch

[David Quigley <selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/24/2012 12:14, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/24/2012 11:05 AM, Moray Henderson wrote:
> > I've got a policy module which works fine when I build and load it 
> > on
> > CentOS 5.  When I build and try to load it on CentOS 6 it complains:
> >
> > SELinux:  Could not downgrade policy file
> > /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24, searching for an older 
> > version.
> > SELinux:  Could not open policy file <=
> > /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24:  No such file or directory
> >
> > There's nothing in the policy source specifying version so I would 
> > have
> > expected the module automatically to build for the correct policy 
> > version
> > when built on CentOS 6.  Any pointers where to look or what to do 
> > next?
> >
> >
> > Moray. "To err is human; to purr, feline."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>
>
> Read
>
> http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/49762.html
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk++XlAACgkQrlYvE4MpobMf+wCghm6D/Gn5Yh9mLIHF1vTo5k2m
> 7KkAnRSdi7LWcywz1LeE6ir8nygh1wVj
> =hxTJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> selinux mailing list
> selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

I don't think your post applies to his question. His email seems to 
indicate to me that he is building the policy binary on RHEL 6 for RHEL 
6 and then on install time its trying to downgrade the policy. He is 
wondering why it didn't just build for the policy version being used by 
the system.

Dave
--
selinux mailing list
selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux