|
|
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On February 3, 2012 09:41:07 Paul Howarth wrote:
> You could actually include pre-built modules with the necessary policy
> in your packages, e.g. as described in:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_Policy_Modules_Packaging_Draft
didn't notice that document before - thanks for the reference.
> So if package A and package B both have policy allowing something
> (rather than messing with a boolean), removing one of those packages and
> its policy module will still leave the other's policy module present and
> hence it will still be able to do what it needed to do.
In other words - I did suspect that modules is the closest thing that complies
with the above (aside from meta-packages that only have %post sections
populated with "semanage" statements)
--
Dmitry Makovey
Web Systems Administrator
Athabasca University
(780) 675-6245
---
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem
Woody Allen
When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout
http://www.wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19330
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- selinux mailing list selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
[Fedora Users] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Photos] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Campsites] [KDE Users] [Gnome Users]