Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:12:42PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, FHS is dead upstream. Linux Foundation made an attempt at
> resuscitation about two years ago, but that immediately stalled again.
> 
> I filed this <https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164> after
> talking to Jeff Licquia at LinuxCon, but it hasn't gotten any response.
> If we feel that FHS continues to be important, maybe we need to get involved
> in that upstream.
> 
<nod>  -- Is there an FHS group to get involved with or does it need to be
a reboot?  Grab a few Debian, Ubuntu, Arch, gentoo, FSF, etc people to look
at what shortcomings we find in the current FHS draft and work on having
those addressed one at a time?

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpOm5ta0frlE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux