Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
From: Russell Golden <niveusluna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:18:32 -0500
Delivered-to: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CANnLRdhbufZ6yg15=JYvqV8xxsQ4AM6EyEbdPjGAfE=p2G2PEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC5dWt12rziRdpSSig-erjF5Jd+4uBYfLyr7JOjFkp0yYJUibg@mail.gmail.com> <CANnLRdhbufZ6yg15=JYvqV8xxsQ4AM6EyEbdPjGAfE=p2G2PEg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> With that.. I would flag that in Fedora's package as something legal
> needs to look at and I would say that retire the EPEL one.

Why would Legal need to look at it?
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Follow-Ups:
- Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  - From: Stephen John Smoogen

References:
- EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  - From: Russell Golden
- Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  - From: Stephen John Smoogen

Prev by Date: Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
Next by Date: Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
Previous by thread: Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
Next by thread: Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]