Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:59:42 -0600
Delivered-to: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4F4CF2F2.4060404@redhat.com>
References: <4F4CBCE2.3090902@redhat.com> <4F4CEA69.30001@math.unl.edu> <4F4CF2F2.4060404@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1

On 02/28/2012 09:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:


Pleas do not be mistaken. We are not speaking about building gems from
sources.

OK, so... is there some other better way to do it then? Please dosuggest any better alternative if you do.


-- rex
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Follow-Ups:
- Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  - From: Vít Ondruch

References:
- New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  - From: Vít Ondruch
- Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  - From: Rex Dieter
- Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  - From: Vít Ondruch

Prev by Date: Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
Next by Date: Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
Previous by thread: Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
Next by thread: Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]