Re: Additional sources / bundled?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:14:47AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 02/10/2012 11:03 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: > > > >> I have a couple of packages that I'm porting from the CCRMA repo. A > >> couple of them list some additional sources that contain only content > >> (ie a PDF or audio presets / no binaries). Do I still have to create > >> separate SPECS for these files? > > > > > > Not necessarily. stuff like documentation or customized configurations make > > sense to *not* package separately. > > Though you want to make a subpackage for docs if they're huge. > If the docs are huge (or even just large ;-) *and* they release on a slightly different timeframe than the programs, you likely want them in a wholly separate package. Otherwise end users end up updating one or the other needlessly. (ie: docs and programs packages installed. Update just the program; end user ends up having to update both packages since the build created new versions of both.) -Toshio
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]