Re: Request for confirmation: Which form is required for a review | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
>>>>> "MR" == Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: MR> To be clear, imho there's no need to take back a granted review, the MR> packager of the reviewed package knows his job well. Again in the good old days, I was also processing most of the SCM requests, so I'd effectively stop the process until the review was re-done. Occasionally this meant that I did my own review. MR> I think, a review generates work to do for the reviewer. Well, theoretically it does. We have nothing to prevent someone from just setting the flag without actually doing any review work at all. Hopefully such stuff would be caught at some point, but really unless someone is actually looking over all of the tickets this doesn't happen. At best someone will notice that a package is in pretty poor shape, look up the review ticket and notice that it wasn't done well. But who has time for that? There are 350+ packages in the review queue. Still. - J< -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
