Re: Multiple file ownership allowed nowadays? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2012, 23:38 -0500 schrieb Jon Stanley: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Christoph Wickert > <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I wonder if this rule is still needed. I know I'd loose backward > > compatibility with older rpm versions, but I don't want make a > > I agree that a -common subpackage is silly for this, but are any of > the RPM versions that this *wouldn't* work with still in supported > releases? Not in Fedora. > The only one I'd be concerned with is RHEL5, but I think even that > works right, no? I haven't tested it, but based on my experience with multi-arch file conflicts I *guess* it will not work on RHEL 5. Regards, Christoph -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
