Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Multiple file ownership allowed nowadays?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2012, 23:38 -0500 schrieb Jon Stanley:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Christoph Wickert
> <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I wonder if this rule is still needed. I know I'd loose backward
> > compatibility with older rpm versions, but I don't want make a
> 
> I agree that a -common subpackage is silly for this, but are any of
> the RPM versions that this *wouldn't* work with still in supported
> releases?

Not in Fedora.

> The only one I'd be concerned with is RHEL5, but I think even that
> works right, no?

I haven't tested it, but based on my experience with multi-arch file
conflicts I *guess* it will not work on RHEL 5.

Regards,
Christoph

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Home]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net