Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Question regarding split of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 01/11/2012 09:20 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/01/12 12:10, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
I just stumbled upon this:

the plan is to separate the bacula-docs subpackage from bacula package
and create a new package bacula-docs.
(review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 )

My question is, is the split possible in existing trees, e.g in F16?
This step doesn't introduce new features, so it shouldn't harm

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Stable_release_updates_vision

There's just the situation that bacula-docs is provided from earlier
bacula-package and also from bacula-docs. Would those two clash in
stable branches?

Shouldn't be a problem as longs as the NEVRs are different. Some perl modules are provided by the main perl package and also independently, resulting in two versions of the same package being available and that doesn't seem to be a problem.

Paul.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Home]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux

Google
  Web www.spinics.net