Re: Override with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 as workaround allowed?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 11:25:39 Robert Scheck wrote: > Hello Tom, > > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think the reason this hasn't been complained of too much is that > > it's generally better to use poll(2) instead of select(2) if your > > program can have a lot of file descriptors open. Have the Zarafa > > developers considered offering a poll()-based option? > > I have taken that topic already to Zarafa, more than void was not yet > returned, however there is an internal developer meeting this week, I > think. > > Even if they decide to rewrite the code, it's not done immediately and > non-paid code rewrites maybe also take some time, it's similar like at > RHEL vs. subscription, if I'm allowed to compare. > > Would -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 be acceptable until the code is rewritten? If you prefer undefined behavior over valid assertion failure, then yes. Kamil -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]