Re: Override with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 as workaround allowed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Tuesday 10 January 2012 11:25:39 Robert Scheck wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think the reason this hasn't been complained of too much is that
> > it's generally better to use poll(2) instead of select(2) if your
> > program can have a lot of file descriptors open.  Have the Zarafa
> > developers considered offering a poll()-based option?
> I have taken that topic already to Zarafa, more than void was not yet
> returned, however there is an internal developer meeting this week, I
> think.
> Even if they decide to rewrite the code, it's not done immediately and
> non-paid code rewrites maybe also take some time, it's similar like at
> RHEL vs. subscription, if I'm allowed to compare.
> Would -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 be acceptable until the code is rewritten?

If you prefer undefined behavior over valid assertion failure, then yes.

packaging mailing list

[Home]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux