Re: ZendFramework a library which should not be bundled? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
> Hi everyone, > > I'm about to package Tine 2.0 (http://www.tine20.org/) and almost have a > package ready for review. One open issue I would like to clarify in > advance is, if I should consider the ZendFramework for PHP a library > which should not be bundled according to [1]? > > At present the package is shipping it's own copy of the ZendFramework as > delivered with the original Tine 2.0 tarball, but I could remove that > and require the php-ZendFramework package instead. > > Please let me know what you think about this. Yes, Zend would be considered a bundled library in this case, stript it out, Require and use the system version. -J > > Best Regards, > Dominic > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > > -- > Dominic Hopf > http://dominichopf.de/ > > Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
