Re: Package review SIG dead?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On 10/13/2011 06:41 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:35:28PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>>> "AG" == Andy Grimm<agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> AG> I don't think there's any need to send email for every review; I >> AG> wouldn't want that on any list. >> >> Well, actually, all of that traffic is already on a list (the >> package-review list). I subscribe and there were times when I actually >> read all of the traffic there. >> >> Anyway, I've gone back and forth about using this list or -devel. I'd >> hate to have "yet another list (TM)" but I'd hate to annoy anyone (and >> trying to do things in -devel is mostly pointless). >> >> So maybe start here and move to a separate list of the volume becomes >> too high? >> > +1. I've not yet summoned the time to participate in the Package Review SIG > and I don't see a problem with sharing this list for now. Likely, the > questions that arise around package review would end up on this list anyhow. IMO, this list should remain restricted to resolving packaging principles and to resolving corner-cases/precedences (An "expert list") At least I do not want to this list to become a newbie forum nor "yet another source" of review spam. You might not want to hear this, but to me personally, the chatter and the bureaucrazy's (typo intended) noise on package-review@ already is beyond "being bearable". Ralf -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]