Re: Package review SIG dead?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On 10/13/2011 06:41 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:35:28PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>>> "AG" == Andy Grimm<agrimm@xxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>> AG>  I don't think there's any need to send email for every review; I
>> AG>  wouldn't want that on any list.
>> Well, actually, all of that traffic is already on a list (the
>> package-review list).  I subscribe and there were times when I actually
>> read all of the traffic there.
>> Anyway, I've gone back and forth about using this list or -devel.  I'd
>> hate to have "yet another list (TM)" but I'd hate to annoy anyone (and
>> trying to do things in -devel is mostly pointless).
>> So maybe start here and move to a separate list of the volume becomes
>> too high?
> +1. I've not yet summoned the time to participate in the Package Review SIG
> and I don't see a  problem with sharing this list for now.  Likely, the
> questions that arise around package review would end up on this list anyhow.

IMO, this list should remain restricted to resolving packaging 
principles and to resolving corner-cases/precedences (An "expert list")

At least I do not want to this list to become a newbie forum nor "yet 
another source" of review spam. You might not want to hear this, but to 
me personally, the chatter and the bureaucrazy's (typo intended) noise 
on package-review@ already is beyond "being bearable".

packaging mailing list

[Home]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux