Re: Package review SIG dead?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:35:28PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "AG" == Andy Grimm <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > AG> I don't think there's any need to send email for every review; I > AG> wouldn't want that on any list. > > Well, actually, all of that traffic is already on a list (the > package-review list). I subscribe and there were times when I actually > read all of the traffic there. > > Anyway, I've gone back and forth about using this list or -devel. I'd > hate to have "yet another list (TM)" but I'd hate to annoy anyone (and > trying to do things in -devel is mostly pointless). > > So maybe start here and move to a separate list of the volume becomes > too high? > +1. I've not yet summoned the time to participate in the Package Review SIG and I don't see a problem with sharing this list for now. Likely, the questions that arise around package review would end up on this list anyhow. -Toshio
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]