Re: Mozilla Extension Guidelines | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:33:02 +0200 Thomas Spura wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 12:34:47 -0400 > David Michael wrote: > > Is it appropriate to support any/all applications listed in the > > install.rdf, even if they are not available in Fedora? (I don't > > see a downside to this if the draft guidelines are followed, and it > > would allow locally managed applications to take advantage of > > extensions installed from RPMs.) > > I would do so, if the applications are free and have a chance of > beeing in fedora in the future (some extra symlinks don't need any > relevant space). Better support that applications, you want to support ;) I haven't heard anything of "Fennec" or "E Music" till looking into the install.rdf right now. I'll just support seamonkey and firefox till there is a feature request for anything else... Thanks, Tom -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
