Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
From: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:16:15 -0400
Delivered-to: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <201004262343.17195.akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <201004262343.17195.akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

> GCJ AOT bits are mandatory parts of any Java packages according to current 
> guidelines.

I thought we wrote the guidelines to make them optional.  I agree they
should definitely be made optional at this point.

Andrew
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
  - From: Jason L Tibbitts III

References:
- Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
  - From: Alexander Kurtakov

Prev by Date: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
Next by Date: Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
Previous by thread: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
Next by thread: Re: Update for the GCJ section of Java Guidelines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]