Re: package review template | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 10:12:26PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > Imho the mistake here is, that it is not documented in the guidelines. If > there are secret important issues that need to be checked, where should the > new reviewers come from? It is not secret, it is specific for a package or a class of packages. It comes from the brain. This is especially true for the integration issues that cannot all be in the guidelines. As a side note, if there was only things that are in the guidelines and can be put on a check list, packaging and reviewing packages would be very boring ;-) > Even simple items can be easily forgotten, if it is a PITA to find them all in > the huge collection of Guidelines. A template won't help, but removing things from the guidelines or arranging the guidelines to be easier to read. -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]
