Re: time for a review-oh-matic?

["Chris Weyl" <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:21:04PM -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
>> So, building on the spirited debate going on with respect to a
>> suggested review template, is it time for a review-oh-matic type
>> service?
[...snip...]
> Of course this is all a huge job and I'm not volunteering to write
> it, but I think more formal automation in the package review process
> would be very beneficial, particularly if it could help us track or
> identify changes post-review.

Also a good project -- but one, I think, whose scope and goals are
different than a "just automate the brainless, repetitive tasks" sorta
deal :-)

                                             -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging