Re: package review template

["Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday, 03 October 2008 at 11:48, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:34 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri October 3 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > 
> > > However, one of my actual point is a bit different: Once one starts
> > > formulating such a "template", people will start to nit-pick and to
> > > argue on (missing) details (e.g. corner-cases) and in longer terms will
> > > start to demand for "laws", "regulations" and "forms".
> > 
> > I guess we have different pictures about such a template. For me it would be 
> > an itemized list, where each item is a summary of one guideline from all the 
> > Guideline documents, maybe with an URL that links to the specific guideline. 
> > The nit-picking should then only affect the normal guidelines.

> Let me put it differently: I am referring to certain particular people,
> of whom I find it very obious that they have no clue about what they are
> doing in reviews.

Oh, how I hate such vague accusations. Ralf! Please tell us exactly who
you're referring to and what *exactly* makes you think they have no clue.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging