[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Do we need to add %{_isa} flag?
- Re: Do we need to add %{_isa} flag?
- Re: Do we need to add %{_isa} flag?
- Do we need to add %{_isa} flag?
- scriptlets exit status documentation change
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-05-16 16:00 - 17:50 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-05-16 16:00 UTC)
- Re: queries about merging 2 packages
- Re: Using autogenerated sources
- Re: queries about merging 2 packages
- Re: queries about merging 2 packages
- Re: queries about merging 2 packages
- Re: queries about merging 2 packages
- queries about merging 2 packages
- Re: Using autogenerated sources
- Re: Using autogenerated sources
- Re: Using autogenerated sources
- Using autogenerated sources
- Re: Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-05-09 16:00 - 17:05 UTC)
- Re: Bundled text-based .afm font files
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-05-09 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Bundled text-based .afm font files
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Fwd: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 6.0.37 released
- From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Re: Convert 64bit DEB to RPM - dependency errors
- Re: Convert 64bit DEB to RPM - dependency errors
- Re: Convert 64bit DEB to RPM - dependency errors
- Re: Convert 64bit DEB to RPM - dependency errors
- Re: Convert 64bit DEB to RPM - dependency errors
- Convert 64bit DEB to RPM - dependency errors
- Re: Package rename breakage - wat do?
- Auto-Provides and glibc
- Re: Package rename breakage - wat do?
- Re: rpm pre/post script order
- Re: rpm pre/post script order
- Re: rpm pre/post script order
- rpm pre/post script order
- Re: Package rename breakage - wat do?
- Re: Package rename breakage - wat do?
- Package rename breakage - wat do?
- Re: using the tilde in tarball versions
- Re: using the tilde in tarball versions
- Re: using the tilde in tarball versions
- Re: using the tilde in tarball versions
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-05-01 16:00 - 17:00 UTC)
- Re: using the tilde in tarball versions
- Re: using the tilde in tarball versions
- using the tilde in tarball versions
- Re: Avoid a 32 bits package from being pushed into 64 bits repository
- From: Alejandro Alvarez Ayllon
- revised draft Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Avoid a 32 bits package from being pushed into 64 bits repository
- Avoid a 32 bits package from being pushed into 64 bits repository
- From: Alejandro Alvarez Ayllon
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Re: Bundled text-based .afm font files
- Re: Lightworks video editor
- Lightworks video editor
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-04-24 16:00 - 16:45 UTC)
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Bundled text-based .afm font files
- Re: [fedora-java] Shipping of binaries in jar files
- Re: [fedora-java] Shipping of binaries in jar files
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-04-24 16:00 - 16:45 UTC)
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-04-24 16:00 - 16:45 UTC)
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- BitBucket SourceURL?
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- %{macro} vs. %macro in spec files
- Re: perl packaging with oracle library
- Re: perl packaging with oracle library
- perl packaging with oracle library
- Open Seat on the Fedora Packaging Committee
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: doxygen and copied font files
- doxygen and copied font files
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Could and how we use jpackage repository to packaging?
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Could and how we use jpackage repository to packaging?
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Static UIDs and GIDs
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Static UIDs and GIDs
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Problem when packaging Google's product
- Re: Problem when packaging Google's product
- Re: Problem when packaging Google's product
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Problem when packaging Google's product
- Problem when packaging Google's product
- Re: libtool rpath issues
- Re: Required use of /opt for AWS compatability
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: libtool rpath issues
- libtool rpath issues
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: JFYI: snappy conflicts
- JFYI: snappy conflicts
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Re: Web server conf selection
- Web server conf selection
- Re: python3-pyside package issue
- Re: python3-pyside package issue
- python3-pyside package issue
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Inconsistencies in Python package naming
- Re: Filtering Provides for Node.js Binary Extension Modules
- Re: Filtering Provides for Node.js Binary Extension Modules
- Re: Required use of /opt for AWS compatability
- Required use of /opt for AWS compatability
- Re: Moving non-guideline stuff out of guidelines
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Moving non-guideline stuff out of guidelines
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Vote in ticket: Ruby Guidelines update
- Re: RPM macro for /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d?
- Re: RPM macro for /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d?
- RPM macro for /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d?
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Filtering Provides for Node.js Binary Extension Modules
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- [Proposal] Packaging guidelines/spec per version
- Re: Question about packaging of MPICH2
- Question about packaging of MPICH2
- From: Andrew Prokhorenkov
- Re: FPC Meeting this week
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FPC Meeting this week
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: FPC Meeting this week
- Re: FPC Meeting this week
- Re: FPC Meeting this week
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: FPC Meeting this week
- Re: FPC Meeting this week
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- FPC Meeting this week
- Re: Source URL with spaces (%20)
- Re: Source URL with spaces (%20)
- Re: Question regarding min and max dependencies
- Re: Question regarding min and max dependencies
- Re: Question regarding min and max dependencies
- Re: Question regarding min and max dependencies
- Re: Source URL with spaces (%20)
- Re: Question regarding min and max dependencies
- Re: Question regarding min and max dependencies
- Question regarding min and max dependencies
- Source URL with spaces (%20)
- Is CSS Considered Content or Code?
- Re: Bundling
- Re: Bundling
- Re: Bundling
- Bundling
- Re: How to handle py2/py3 scripts under /usr/bin
- Re: revised Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- Re: How to handle py2/py3 scripts under /usr/bin
- Re: How to handle py2/py3 scripts under /usr/bin
- Re: How to handle py2/py3 scripts under /usr/bin
- How to handle py2/py3 scripts under /usr/bin
- Re: revised Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: revised Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- revised Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging Cron Jobs in the distribution
- Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging Cron Jobs in the distribution
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging Cron Jobs in the distribution
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging Cron Jobs in the distribution
- Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging Cron Jobs in the distribution
- Re: Packaging guidelines for packaging Cron Jobs in the distribution
- Packaging guidelines for packaging Cron Jobs in the distribution
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
- Re: Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
- Eclipse PTP build/packaging issue
- Re: Scratch building against a package in testing
- Re: Scratch building against a package in testing
- Re: Scratch building against a package in testing
- Re: Scratch building against a package in testing
- Re: Scratch building against a package in testing
- Re: Scratch building against a package in testing
- Re: Scratch building against a package in testing
- Scratch building against a package in testing
- Re: fedora-foo.desktop vendor prefix breakage
- Re: fedora-foo.desktop vendor prefix breakage
- Re: fedora-foo.desktop vendor prefix breakage
- [Fwd: how reload udev rules and systemd on F18]
- Re: packaging in a nutshell
- Re: packaging in a nutshell
- Re: packaging in a nutshell
- packaging in a nutshell
- Re: Orphaning my packages
- Re: Orphaning my packages
- Orphaning my packages
- Re: fedora-foo.desktop vendor prefix breakage
- Re: How to restart services after upgrade?
- How to restart services after upgrade?
- fedora-foo.desktop vendor prefix breakage
- Re: JavaScript
- Re: JavaScript
- Re: JavaScript
- Re: JavaScript
- Re: JavaScript
- Re: JavaScript
- JavaScript
- Re: Getting the list of source files from a spec file.
- Getting the list of source files from a spec file.
- [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: Directory ownership question
- Re: Directory ownership question
- Re: Directory ownership question
- Re: Directory ownership question
- Re: Directory ownership question
- Directory ownership question
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: Ruby vs. JRuby - alternatives or not?
- Re: Ruby vs. JRuby - alternatives or not?
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: Ruby vs. JRuby - alternatives or not?
- Ruby vs. JRuby - alternatives or not?
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: package reviews: new Release for every update
- Re: package reviews: new Release for every update
- Re: package reviews: new Release for every update
- Re: parallel make
- Re: Fedora Review error.
- Re: Need help with the rpmbuild
- Re: Fedora Review error.
- Fedora Review error.
- Re: guayadeque pkgconfig question
- Re: guayadeque pkgconfig question
- Re: guayadeque pkgconfig question
- Re: guayadeque pkgconfig question
- guayadeque pkgconfig question
- Re: Strange gdm packaging
- Re: Need help with the rpmbuild
- Re: Need help with the rpmbuild
- Re: Need help with the rpmbuild
- Re: Strange gdm packaging
- Need help with the rpmbuild
- Strange gdm packaging
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: No -devel package
- Re: No -devel package
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: No -devel package
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
- policycoreutils-devel
- No -devel package
- Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
- Re: Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
- Re: Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
- Re: Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
- Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
- Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
- Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
- Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
- Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
- Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
- Re: parallel make
- Re: parallel make
- Re: Packaging webfonts
- Re: parallel make
- Re: parallel make
- Re: parallel make
- Re: parallel make
- Re: parallel make
- Re: parallel make
- parallel make
- Packaging webfonts
- Orphaning gksu-polkit
- need review
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
- Re: should packages be changed to use libexec?
- should packages be changed to use libexec?
- Re: [Bug 874105] New: Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
- Re: SPEC for multiple python versions
- Re: is /etc/cron.*/* config file?
- Re: is /etc/cron.*/* config file?
- SPEC for multiple python versions
- is /etc/cron.*/* config file?
- [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
- Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
- Fwd: [fpc] #229: New mpi module install location and content
- Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
- Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
- PHP Guidelines - minor change
- Multiple packages with the same base name versioning
- Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
- Re: [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
- Re: [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
- Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Re: discussion around 'policy' for multiple versions of same software in EPEL
- Re: Unbundling oscpack and boost libraries under review
- Unbundling oscpack and boost libraries under review
- discussion around 'policy' for multiple versions of same software in EPEL
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
- Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Re: RFD: C/C++ template packages
- Re: RFD: C/C++ template packages
- RFD: C/C++ template packages
- Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
- Re: Dependence on initscripts/chkconfig
- Dependence on initscripts/chkconfig
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
- [Guidelines Change] Change to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- Re: APT,YUM and package status
- APT,YUM and package status
- From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
- Re: Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
- Re: Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
- Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
- Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
- Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
- Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
- requiring a (non-specific) font?
- change to icon scriptlets to use -f flag seems wrong
- Re: Error with desktop-file-install
- Re: Error with desktop-file-install
- Error with desktop-file-install
- Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
- Re: Using upstream unusual package name
- Re: Using upstream unusual package name
- Re: Using upstream unusual package name
- Re: Using upstream unusual package name
- Re: Using upstream unusual package name
- Re: Using upstream unusual package name
- Using upstream unusual package name
- Re: guayadeque package review and bundled files
- package naming -- axis2 version 1.4
- guayadeque package review and bundled files
- Re: glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
- Re: glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
- glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
- Re: version-release for different branches
- Re: version-release for different branches
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: version-release for different branches
- Re: version-release for different branches
- Re: version-release for different branches
- Re: version-release for different branches
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: version-release for different branches
- Re: version-release for different branches
- version-release for different branches
- Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: [Bug 821631] Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- Re: php/php53 application packaging
- php/php53 application packaging
- Re: When to use a leading underscore?
- Re: When to use a leading underscore?
- Re: When to use a leading underscore?
- Re: When to use a leading underscore?
- Re: [Bug 821631] Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
- [Bug 821631] Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
- When to use a leading underscore?
- anybody working on smuxi?
- Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
- Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
- Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
- Re: Provides for unversioned so files
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Provides for unversioned so files
- Re: Provides for unversioned so files
- Re: Provides for unversioned so files
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Provides for unversioned so files
- Provides for unversioned so files
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
- Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
- Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
- Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
- Other people modifying specfiles...
- Re: Build dependencies
- Re: Build dependencies
- Build dependencies
- From: Sébastien Nicouleaud
- Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
- Location of LICENSE and README file
- Re: packaging an axis2-based service
- Re: packaging an axis2-based service
- Re: packaging an axis2-based service
- Re: packaging an axis2-based service
- packaging an axis2-based service
- Re: Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
- Re: Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
- Re: versioning question for stax-utils
- Re: Is this a bug or not?
- Re: Is this a bug or not?
- Re: versioning question for stax-utils
- versioning question for stax-utils
- Re: Is this a bug or not?
- Re: Is this a bug or not?
- Is this a bug or not?
- [Guidelines Change] Change to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
- Re: refuse an upgrade?
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: refuse an upgrade?
- Re: .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
- refuse an upgrade?
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
- Re: .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
- .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
- Re: packaging Digest, Vol 89, Issue 10
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
- Re: clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
- clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: Script-Tools, which location?
- Re: Script-Tools, which location?
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: Script-Tools, which location?
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: revision of Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- Script-Tools, which location?
- Re: Obsoletes and Provides
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: Obsoletes and Provides
- Re: RPM macros
- Obsoletes and Provides
- Re: Where to install LD_PRELOAD libraries
- Re: Where to install LD_PRELOAD libraries
- Re: RPM macros
- Re: RPM macros
- RPM macros
- revision of Haskell Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Using Cmake in a package...
- Where to install LD_PRELOAD libraries
- Using Cmake in a package...
- Building the freemedforms suite
- Re: Adjust old ruby guidelines to new ruby guidelines
- OT: Re: Where Can I Find Previous Versions?
- Where Can I Find Previous Versions?
- Re: Python compiled files without .py in a name
- Python compiled files without .py in a name
- Adjust old ruby guidelines to new ruby guidelines
- Re: Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
- Re: Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
- Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
- PHP library must not requires Apache
- Re: imapsync packaging in fedora
- imapsync packaging in fedora
- From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
- Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Incorrect suggestion in sysvinit packaging guide?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Incorrect suggestion in sysvinit packaging guide?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
- Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: root of a repository
- Re: root of a repository
- scriptlets
- Re: Adding subpackage == new review?
- Re: Adding subpackage == new review?
- Adding subpackage == new review?
- Re: Self Introduction
- From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
- root of a repository
- From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
- Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
- Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
- Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
- Can multiple packages built from same source?
- Self Introduction
- Re: GNULib exception link on FPC trac
- Re: GNULib exception link on FPC trac
- GNULib exception link on FPC trac
- Re: opensmtpd - http://www.opensmtpd.org/