[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
  Web www.spinics.net

[Bug 808768] Review Request: annox - Java annotations in XML resources

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-15 08:43:54 EDT ---
Fixed issue:

[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging

Checked now:

[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.

Some minor problems not blocking the package:

[!]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.

Tests are skipped, but a justification is given.

[!]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.

A newer upstream version is available.

[!]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
     separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
     include it.

The maintainer hasn't asked upstream to include the license text.

Because the remaining issues are not very important, annox is:

*** APPROVED ***

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
package-review mailing list

[Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Add to Google