[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

[Bug 796074] Review Request: numad - NUMA user daemon



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796074

Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(jsynacek@redhat.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #2 from Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-22 10:52:56 EST ---
I'll take this.

Minor issue: there's some trailing whitespace in the spec. Some in the
description and some after %preun

Here's the fedora-review issues output when run on f16:

[!]: MUST Buildroot is not present
     Note: Invalid buildroot found:
     %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot

Just drop the Buildroot from the spec, maybe it was just added for local test
purposes? If that's the case, setup rpmmacros like

cat ~/.rpmmacros 
%_topdir /home/crobinso/src/rpmroot

[!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL
[!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5

These two aren't required since it doesn't sound like this is heading for EPEL,
rather RHEL proper. These changes may need to be made for RHEL though (not
blocking this review).

[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.

rpmlint numad-debuginfo-0.5-1.fc18.i686.rpm

numad-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

  Not quite sure what the problem is here

rpmlint numad-0.5-1.fc18.src.rpm

numad.src: W: strange-permission numad1.patch 0600L

  making it 644 will probably silence this

numad.src: W: invalid-url Source0: numad-0.5.tar.xz

  Not an error per-se, but since you seem to own the fedorahosted git repo,
  why not just make a 0.5 tarball and upload it to fedorahosted? See the
  FAQ for publishing releases.

  https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq

  Otherwise since you are doing a git snapshot, you should follow the (more
  complex) git naming guidelines:

  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages

  I'd recommend just cutting an upstream tarball.

numad.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

  I assume this has to do with systemd unit files, so safe to ignore.


Also, can you provide more info about the patch in the spec file? Why isn't it
upstream? Will it ever be upstream? What are the two difference licenses the
spec comment talks about? Should there be two licenses in the License field?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

Add to Google