|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Jun 10, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
Double post but I have removed gcc etc from the list here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FullExceptionList <adesklets.spec>
Hi Marc, I took a look at your spec file. Now, keep in mind that I don't often (ie. ever) do package reviews, but here's my advise FWIW:
Overall the spec looks very good. I did make a few changes which I outline below and are in the attached spec file. Once you get your package built, I would also recommend running rpmlint against it to see what it says.
-Use macros for perl, python directories. Add the python macro definition at the top of the spec; perl macro is already defined in rpm.
-Source0 should be a full URL -I think that naming the patch with the package name-version is helpful-Try building your package without the 'Requires' line and see if rpmbuild is able to automatically pull in requires for at least perl & python (I think it will).
-Change %patch to %patch0 Let me know if you have any questions. -Jeff
Description: Binary data
-- Fedora-mentors-list mailing list Fedora-mentors-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mentors-list
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]