| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 10:17:31AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Mani A <a.mani.cms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Vendors should clearly state the quality of the media being used. > > I do not agree with this. I think vendors should be required to have a > stated warranty on the media to be listed. They are required to do this, if they use the Fedora trademarks to advertise the media for sale: http://fedoraproject.org/legal/trademarks/guidelines/page4.html -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpmFioizgzRW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
[Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Home] [Kernel List] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]
|
![]() |