| RSS |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
2008/8/19 Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> Owners stats: >> - 6517 packages >> - 10799 binary rpms in devel > > Darn, I was afraid of that. We are all perfectly aware that one package > (tarball + spec file) can yield more than one binary rpm. Would it be better to consistently start using a term like component or module to indicate the tarball+spec+patchset entity...especially since people are vectoring towards making it possible to work with explode sources in our buildsystem without generating an srpm 'package' at all. Yes those people may or may not be smoking crack.. but they appear to be pretty serious about making it possible to work with some sort of exploded tree as an option to srpms for some of the components we maintain...can't really call an exploded tree a package. -jef -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
[Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Home] [Kernel List] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9 Mailing List] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]
|
|