Re: Good candidate for packaging: Conquest
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Peter Lemenkov wrote:
10 Aug 2008 06:44:25 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>:"PL" == Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:PL> (1/28/99) Due to a little prodding from Sunsite, I've decided PL> on the ARTISTIC LICENSE (see the LICENSE file) for Conquest. Version 1 of the Artistic license is not permitted in Fedora. Which version is this under?Licensing terms for Conquest: http://conq.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/conq/trunk/LICENSE?revision=148&view=markup For me it looks like Artistic License v.1 http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license-1.0.php
As noted in the OSI link above, artistic 1.0 has legal issues and is a deprecated license. It is not permitted for new packages for quite sometime now though packages that were earlier included still are there while some folks were trying to get them relicensed after discussions with the various upstream projects. Fedora 10 will have no more artistic 1.0 licensed packages anymore.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Artistic1RemovalIf possible, point upstream to this page and see if they are interested to move to artistic 2.0 or one of the many other permitted licenses.
Rahul _______________________________________________ Fedora-games-list mailing list Fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
[Fedora Music] [Fedora Extras] [Kernel] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora Directory] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [CentOS] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Camping]