[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ?



Matthias Saou wrote:
Jima wrote :

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote:
Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be the nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it might be worth suggesting they do similar for their package ?
  -1, Flamebait ;-)

Why? First of all, the package doesn't come from freshrpms, but
rpmforge, as I've never packaged it on freshrpms ;-)
Second, you should contact Dries and suggest :
1) To remove the rpmforge clamav packages for the Fedora releases which
have them in Extras
2) To consider using the clamav-db name instead of clamav-data

Then also poke the Extras clamav maintainer to have the proper
"Obsoletes: clamav-db <= last-known-V-R" added to the clamav-data
package.

I read several complaints on fedora-list about the way clamav is packaged in Extras, I think that's why a lot of people use the RPMs from other repos...

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Home]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Fedora Bible]     [Red Hat 9]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

RSS
Powered by Linux