|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Matthias Saou wrote:
Jima wrote :On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Timms wrote:Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be the nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it might be worth suggesting they do similar for their package ?-1, Flamebait ;-)Why? First of all, the package doesn't come from freshrpms, but rpmforge, as I've never packaged it on freshrpms ;-) Second, you should contact Dries and suggest : 1) To remove the rpmforge clamav packages for the Fedora releases which have them in Extras 2) To consider using the clamav-db name instead of clamav-data Then also poke the Extras clamav maintainer to have the proper "Obsoletes: clamav-db <= last-known-V-R" added to the clamav-data package.
I read several complaints on fedora-list about the way clamav is packaged in Extras, I think that's why a lot of people use the RPMs from other repos...
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]