should clamav-data package supersede clamav-db ?

[David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, I noticed that pup updates and yum updates were failing to complete 
for the last 3 weeks or so. One of the packages was for clamav: 
installed clamav-db requires clamav version that is currently installed. 
I guessed this was a packaging error that would be solved in due course.

What I realize now is that my clamav package is from freshrpms or 
rpmforge. Here the virus-definitions were in clamav-db, whereas in 
extras they are in clamav-data. So, while the EVR is higher -2 to -1, 
this wont upgrade the freshrpms packages because of the name change.

Perhaps changing the clamav-data package to obsolete clamav-db would be 
the nicest way to solve this. And if forge/fresh continue to package, it 
might be worth suggesting they do similar for their package ?

DaveT.

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list