Re: Requires/BuildRequires in package descriptions
On Saturday 10 March 2007, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I've once again found some BuildRequires which ended up in a package
> description (already filed in Bugzilla). This is not the first time this
> happens. If the BuildRequires is listed after the description, RPM
> considers it part of the description. This is bad because this means the
> BuildRequires is ignored, which gets unnoticed if the package still builds
> (with reduced functionality) without it.
Good idea, the next version of rpmlint will check this.
http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1330
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
[Home]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Art]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Package Review]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Red Hat 9 Bible]
[Fedora Bible]
[Red Hat 9]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]
