| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Peter Vrabec <pvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Sorry, but I saw enough issues on fedora-maintainers. Issues there were only of non-technical nature. Things like: * it's proprietary, nobody else uses it * causes lot of discussions are no blockers. > Another think is how we would deal with fedora-usermgmt in RHEL > environment. This is a fedora list... ;) When the '--hint' patch for shadow-utils would be applied and the configurability of the shadow-utils package be enhanced (handle /usr/sbin/useradd with 'alternatives', use an overridable virtual Provides: for the hint-translator), it can be used for RHEL too. Adding a kickstart option to specifiy the fixed window of available uids would ease integration into RHEL. > I'd like to see dynamic UID in range 100-500 and nothing else. By default, fedora-usermgmt does not violate this constraint. Enrico -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]
|
![]() |