Re: Data Packages Guideline
>>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
AT> If the existing guidelines cover this (which they do), then why
AT> add it?
Because it needs to be written down somewhere.
AT> Anything for the packaging guidelines needs to be voted upon.
No disagreement, but this isn't a modification to the packaging
guidelines.
Are you sure you understand what's being discussed here? How would
anyone know about the procedure for doing this if it weren't in the
wiki somewhere?
- J<
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
[Home]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Art]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Package Review]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Red Hat 9 Bible]
[Fedora Bible]
[Red Hat 9]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]
