|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Thomas Sailer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:26 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:Great! I'm very much looking forward to these packages.Thus we have given a group of 3 students the assignment to create high quality rpm packages of binutils gcc and the needed libs for Fedora to allow crosscompiling to Atmel AVR / ARM Linux on Fedora. I'm personallyWhy not /usr/share/avr/include, /usr/share/arm-linux/lib etc.? From the4) libraries respectively headers will be installed under /usr/avr/lib resp /usr/avr/include for avr and under /usr/arm-linux/lib resp /usr/arm-linux/include for arm-linux. I know this doesn't seem FHS compliant, still I believe this is the right way, rationale:view of the host, this is shareable data, i.e. I can use the same data with an i386 avr-gcc or a ppc avr-gcc, no?
Because all the cross-compile makefiles, binutils/gcc/glibc configure script etc, expect it to be under $prefix/$target. Moving away from this will become a HUGE patchfest and then people will start complaining that app XXYZ doesn't work with our cross-compile toolchain because we did things different.
Besides that there are binaries installed under /usr/avr/bin, moving things to under /usr/share thus is not an option.
Also see the long list of rationale I gave in the original post, but you didn't bother to go into.
Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]