Re: libInventor.so.0.0.0: bug or feature?

[Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:46 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On 2/13/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 13:57 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> > > [giallu@molzilla ~]$ rpm -q Inventor
> > > Inventor-2.1.5-24.fc5
> > > [giallu@molzilla ~]$ rpm -ql Inventor
> > > [snip]
> > > /usr/lib/libInventor.so.0
> > > /usr/lib/libInventor.so.0.0.0
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > is this made intentionally?
> >
> > I don't understand - Could you elaborate?
> >
> 
> I meant the 0.0.0 triplet used as version. Is that right/usual to have?

There is nothing wrong in using "libXXX.so.0.0.0" for a library using an
SONAME of "libXXX.so.0", accompanied by a symlink "libXXX.so.0" pointing
to "libXXX.so.0.0.0".

> In the meanwhile, I spotted a problem in the spec file: around line
> 220 there are 4 install commands like:
> 
> install -d m755
> 
> instead of
> 
> install -d -m755

Thanks, will fix in CVS.

Ralf


-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list