Re: prompts in command examples

["Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 07:46 +1000, Murray McAllister wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [snip]
> > * Use full path to command when it is not likely to be in the _user's_
> > default path, which is changing for F10.
> 
> I started using the full path, then realized it is not needed for
> Fedora 10, so I stopped using it. I'm going to go back and fix all of
> these up, because everyone reading might not have Fedora 10 :(
> 
> Should documentation for Fedora 10 assume that people only use Fedora
> 10 (e.g. do not use the full path)?

That is a great question.  I just confirmed in the Beta that the user
$PATH is functionally the same as root's (minus /usr/kerberos/sbin).

It appears we can, for the first time, remove full paths from most
commands.  One can always use it for clarity sake, but the full path
usually clutters the content.

Any objections?

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Community Gardener
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list