Re: Persistent overlay?

[Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I'm not sure whether changing this midstream is a great idea.  After
> all, the "persistence" and "persistent overlay" were terms I described
> repeatedly and consistently with every one of the dozen or more
> interviews I gave for Fedora 9. 

I noticed and it I am still not sure it is the right choice. Many people 
didn't even get the idea on what was different from previous releases of 
Fedora or other distributions on this particular USB feature. I am still 
of the opinion "persistent overlay" is just not the right terminology 
for end users.

Rahul

--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list