Re: Persistent overlay?

["Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 13:22 +0300, John Babich wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Rahul Sundaram
> <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suggested to Luke to use something better than "persistent overlay" to
> > describe the amount of space alloted for storing software changes and
> > settings in a Live USB.
> >
> How about "permanent storage"?

Tough call -- because the space is used for differences in the whole
file system, not just data storage.  So a 512 MB overlay doesn't mean
the user can store 512 MB of data, especially if they start changing the
package complement.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list