Re: Persistent overlay?
|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 13:22 +0300, John Babich wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Rahul Sundaram > <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I suggested to Luke to use something better than "persistent overlay" to > > describe the amount of space alloted for storing software changes and > > settings in a Live USB. > > > How about "permanent storage"? Tough call -- because the space is used for differences in the whole file system, not just data storage. So a 512 MB overlay doesn't mean the user can store 512 MB of data, especially if they start changing the package complement. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Fedora Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]