Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: [389-users] Bind to consumer binds to provider as well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> >
> > When I do a bind to the consumer(slave) I also see a bind to the
> > provider(master) this seems really silly. My understanding is that
> > this behaviour is caused by needing to centrally store login attempts.
> > I have raised this matter previously but just wanted to double check
> > that the behaviour I am seeing is expected and not due to a
> > misconfiguration on our part.
> >
> Are you using Chain On Update for Binds?
> http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:ChainOnUpdate
> >

We are indeed, we used that howto to set it up. Reading it now again it does say it will use the chaining backend for binds. Why is that? If we replicate changes down to the consumer how can the data be "fresher" than the consumer?

Regards

________________________________________________________________________
In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from 
MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses.

________________________________________________________________________
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


[Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Home]     [Fedora Tools]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Red Hat 9]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google