Re: [389-users] upgrading packages | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
> -----Original Message----- > From: 389-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:389-users- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson > Sent: 10 November 2010 14:26 > To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. > Subject: Re: [389-users] upgrading packages > > Angel Bosch Mora wrote: > > hi, > In general, it can't. The reason is that you may be using a centralized > configuration directory server to manage several hosts with one 389- > console. If you do that, the data that needs to be updated is on the remote > server which hosts the configuration directory server (the one with the > o=NetscapeRoot suffix). We need to get at least the console admin > password to update that information remotely. > > - does it matter how many instances are configured? Is "admin server" and "centralized configuration directory" the same thing here? I am slightly confused about this. I thought that you had to have a admin server for each physical hosts? Regards [Gerrard Geldenhuis] ________________________________________________________________________ In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. ________________________________________________________________________ -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
[Fedora Directory Devel] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Home] [Fedora Tools] [Kernel] [Fedora Legacy] [Share Photos] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9 Bible] [Red Hat 9] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]