Re: Using rpm for incremental development builds?

[Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad <at> users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > Also, it would be *really* nice to be able to build qt-copy and have it 
> > update rpm's database to "know" that I have qt4 already .
>
> Are you aware that our qt packages include qt-copy patches and are regularly 
> updated with the latest qt-copy patches?

Hmm, no... I guess I could look at the rpm again, but it wouldn't solve 
the problem for rosegarden, which needs also kdelibs (which would *not* 
be nearly as up-to-date as the near-daily builds I do).

OTOH, I /have/ occasionally had to patch qt, so using an rpm would make 
that a bit harder.

--
Matthew
Warning: This message has not been approved by the FDA.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list