Re: Dependency loops considered harmful? | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:12 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Applications that consist of multiple packages, such as the game > example, should be designated as a group rather than a looped > dependency. Actually a proper fix is to implement the per-package "explicitly installed/pulled in as a dep" flag that has been discussed several times in the past, and is already implemented (thus proven) in the "aptitude" apt front end. We must address this user interface problem if Fedora is to be a shining beacon of open source light in the looming dark future of closed DRM-laden content delivery services such as Steam, Xbox Live and PlayStation Network.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Home] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel List] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]
![]() |
![]() |